About the Website
This is the least important (and
probably least interesting) page of the website. However, it is important to consider the source when introduced
to new information, so it is necessary to tell you a little bit about how these facts and their presentation came about.
I am the editor, and my name is Elicia Sanders. I am a Republican and a constituent of Betty
Brown. I wrote Betty a letter asking about her position on the Trans-Texas Corridor, the Children's Health
Insurance Program, and the one-third property tax cut Betty had discussed at a chamber luncheon. I also wrote that I
disagreed with her support of Speaker Craddick. She failed to respond. I still wanted to know her positions on
the issues, so I decided to look for the answers myself.
What I found was disturbing. I
disagreed with Betty's stance on the issues I had asked about, and on others I found during my search, but that's
not a big deal. It's rare to find a candidate with whom one can agree on all things.
The alarming
pattern that emerged involved Betty's representation of the facts: they seemed to differ greatly from what
had actually occurred. A month after the first letter, I wrote another to Betty, this time telling her what I had found.
I also said I would not vote for her re-election. Again, no response from her or her office.
It seemed to
me then, and still does now, that Betty's description of her tenure in office consistently falls short of being complete.
A representative can get away with a lot in Austin if he or she does not tell people the truth back at home. But constituents
can educate themselves with or without their representative's help. This website was created as a result.
The purpose of this website is not to present the entirety of Betty's voting record. That is
Betty's job. Its purpose is to present facts she has left out. Betty will point out the things she is proud
of, and she has the right to do so. She also has the obligation to keep them in perspective. When she tells
us she voted for something, for example, it's good to know she voted the opposite beforehand.
The website
is not intended to endorse any candidate. It is not funded by anyone except its author, and it has accepted no editorial
content from outside sources. I am a resident of Henderson County. I care about how my neighbors and
I are represented, and I don't think Betty is doing a good job. It's as simple as that.
Below
are the letters I sent Betty.
Letter #1
August 17, 2007
The Honorable Betty Brown
State Representative
Texas House of Representatives
District Office
108
S. Pinkerton, Ste. 105
Athens, TX 75751
Dear Representative
Brown:
As one of your constituents, I read yesterday's Monitor
with interest as it detailed your review of the Legislature's accomplishments during the last session. I was particularly
interested in the increase in funding for CHIP and its extended enrollment period, the moratorium on the Trans-Texas Corridor,
and the one-third reduction in property taxes. I would like to know how you voted on each issue.
For CHIP funding and enrollment, I would like to know how you voted during the 80th Legislative
Session and during the prior session, in which CHIP funding was reduced and enrollment periods were shortened. For the moratorium,
I would like to know how you voted when the Trans-Texas Corridor plan first passed in the Legislature and how you voted on
its postponement. And regarding the property tax reduction, I would like to know if I can expect the actual amount due on
next year's bill to decrease by one-third. Your account in the newspaper leads one to conclude that a $1,200 bill I paid
earlier this year, for example, will drop to approximately $800 next year, provided no substantial changes to the appraisal
value of the property occur. I would like to know if this is true.
On
one last front, I must respectfully and vehemently disagree with your statement that the questioning of Speaker Craddick's
authority was "totally inappropriate." I believe that not only was it appropriate, it was vital to the process of
maintaining balance of power within government. The idea that the voice of the Legislature can and should be stifled by one
person is dangerous. The success of our representative form of government is heavily dependent upon multiple sets of checks
and balances, and when a leader of a legislative body fails or refuses to allow open debate, then the people who elect that
body have a right to be informed of such. That "it took away from the reporting on the good things we accomplished"
is irrelevant to a voter who wants to remain educated about the legislative process. I am glad Republicans and Democrats alike
stood up to a Speaker whose tactics they questioned, and I am glad the media reported on it extensively. I look forward to
seeing what the Attorney General decides on the matter. Regarding the "good things" you lament having been pushed
into the background, I have no doubt politicians looking to get re-elected next cycle will remind us of them in due time.
You or your staff may send your voting record on the aforementioned
to the address listed below. As you can see, I have copied this letter to local newspapers so they too can be informed of
your stance on the issues. I will forward them your response after I receive it.
Sincerely,
Elicia Sanders
Letter
#2
September
12, 2007
The Honorable Betty Brown
State Representative
Texas House of Representatives
District Office
108 S.
Pinkerton, Ste. 105
Athens, TX 75751
Dear Representative
Brown:
In my letter of August 17th, I asked some basic questions
about your record on the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), the Trans-Texas Corridor, and the one-third property
tax decrease you discussed in your speech to a local chamber. Since I have not received a response from your office, I looked
up the answers on my own.
You mentioned increased funding for CHIP
as an accomplishment, saying: "Reducing the number of uninsured individuals will help alleviate the increasing costs
of healthcare for all Texans." I agree. However, I found that you voted to decrease funding for that same program in
2003 and also voted for legislation which resulted in a significant drop in CHIP enrollment.
Your stance on the Trans Texas Corridor is similar. In 2003 you voted to authorize the plan. The
Trans-Texas Corridor will take hundreds of thousands of privately owned acreage out of the hands of citizens and put it in
the hands of state government. In 2007, you eventually agreed to postpone it. Meanwhile, private property remains in jeopardy,
because the Corridor has not been eliminated, it has simply been put on hold.
Finally, on the subject of taxes,
it is clear that we never could have expected a one-third property tax reduction. The savings are eaten up in a variety of
ways, as you partially explained in your August 24th legislative update. If you didn't know this to be true when you gave
your speech, then I question your understanding of the legislation you voted for. If you did know, then it looks like you
misled your audience and everyone else who read the news article that reported the speech in which you discussed these issues.
I am a life-long Republican and have often supported candidates when I did not agree with their entire voting
records, because I believed they had their constituents' best interests at heart. Nearly a month ago, I asked some simple
questions; even if I didn't agree with the answers, I would have appreciated the common courtesy of a timely response.
I think the questions warrant a reply, not just for me, but for all the people you represent.
However, I am mostly
disappointed with your public attempts to justify yourself at our expense. You were elected to fight for us in Austin and
deal with us honestly at home. An incomplete account of your actions may help your image in the short term, but treating your
constituents as if we can be fooled by selectively written speeches or letters conveniently ignored is a poor way to represent
us. As result, I will not vote for your re-election in March. You have had plenty of time to prove yourself as a strong and
forthright voice who speaks on our behalf all the time. On our behalf-not yours.
When March arrives, perhaps we
will have a better candidate on the ballot. We certainly deserve better.
Sincerely,
Elicia Sanders